The Uthayan newspaper printed in
Jaffna is unabashedly a TNA newspaper, I believe owned by the brother of a TNA
parliamentarian. They have a dedicated staff, who are willing to work under
pressure, and little payment to give the Tamil speaking people a version of the
news that is often diametrically opposed to the message the Govt. wishes to
promote. An article on Saturday, 19th October 2013 UK Telegraph is
one that illustrates their defiance. See link below
However more to the point, I would like to go further and say, that at
least a Tamil paper can be virulently anti SL Govt. of Mahinda Rajapakse,
suffer the odd fire, and beating of a journalist, but is able to continue to be
published, owing to the loyalty of its readership and benefactors. The Govt.
dare not close it down, as there will be too much international pressure
against it and uses it as an example of Media freedom, when the Journalists
question that.
What I wish to say is that
ironically due to the relative harmlessness of anti Govt. paper that caters to
the Northern Tamils, who form a relatively small voter base, they are not as
worried as they would be if a prominent Sinhala paper in the South of Sri Lanka
took the same approach. The English speaking press also seems to permit
criticism of the Govt. as it is the usual point made by Govt. when asked about
press censorship, however like the Tamil paper, due to the relatively small
readership of this the electoral affect on the Govt. is small.
So if one were to test true Press
censorship it is only the large circulation Sinhala papers that the Govt.
really cares about. After all the tiny papers like the weekly, Ravaya, Lanka
and Janarala which are usually heavily critical of the Govt. have a very small
readership and are tolerated just for the reason of showing to the world that
we indeed have a Free Press.
For all intents and purposes the
large circulation dailies and weeklies are either pro Govt or are balanced with
muted criticism directed at a few areas that do not upset the proverbial “apple
cart”. There is unquestionably heavy self-censorship practiced in SL as
otherwise the very existence of the Newspaper can be in jeopardy, with NO
international outfit with sufficient TEETH to protect it if they fall foul and
face closure, destruction, or incarceration of all their notable writers and
editors. It is difficult for International Journalists to get the truth from
them.
1 comment:
see related article in the New York Times of Saturday 19th October 2013
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/19/world/asia/a-sri-lankan-journalist-eagerly-toes-the-line.html?_r=1&
This is a Govt. paper that he edits and therefore is heavily biased towards them. (so is clearly un censored!!) No self censorship required here.
Post a Comment