Have
you ever wondered that different people see (also read, feel and hear) the same
event, but have a very different opinion of the experience they get from that
event? (Prefer a freeway to the airport, to a better education for your child)
The
French novelist Marcel Proust once said that “the real voyage of discovery
consists, not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes”
The
whole concept of “Kalpanakaranna” or simply the word “think” sums it all. IF we
think a little we may come to a conclusion substantially different from the
original. Once we get used to thinking what we see, hear, feel, and read, we
are able to more clearly weigh the pros and cons and come to our own
conclusions. We do not have to believe everything or anything! We must be free
to express our own opinions about it and defend it. We then solidify our
thoughts further, or even take a completely different view based on our
perceptions of the strengths and weaknesses of the differing arguments.
This
points to the importance of criticisms of one’s argument. You can then look at
it objectively and see if you can overcome them, or cave in and agree with
them. It is not that you have copped out, just that you have become more
mature, and able to accept a better opinion, and change your own, if indeed you
believe that as a result of your original idea, you were able to improve on it
as you were shown a reason why from a commentator with a better angle!
Into
this whole picture have been many of the recent arguments I have put forward to
improve quality of life of our people, a principle theme of the blog. I have
been fiercely shot down by my critics, who say that it is not what the people
want, they prefer flyovers to toilets (a theme of a future blog entry) and the
politicians of this government are giving them what makes them (the politicians
popular) and that is vastly different to my perception of what I believe the
people should have, but don’t even have the capacity to ask, as they have been
in want for so long, they do not realize it is a need that can easily be
fulfilled by their rulers.
This
chasm is where the criticism comes from, as the pro-Govt. lobby, who currently
comprise the majority, appears content with the empty airports and ports as
they give a sense of pride to them as Sri Lankans, that the lack of a toilet
where their daughter could pee in at her school, is considered a minor
inconvenience!!
3 comments:
yes, debate is good and we appreciate your blog posts.
regarding highways, ports, etc., the voting masses will always appreciate tangible benefits over theoretical arguments so all of the theoretical criticisms of the road fall by the wayside as the masses experience the benefits which have been talked about for decades.
if kids could vote, maybe there would be some better toilets in the schools
Its nothing to do with tangible benefits. Anything can be made into a tangible benefit if marketed properly. Only those clever enough to see through the chaff will understand reality.
Problem is the marketing is only available to one party to deceive and not the counter party to elaborate on the deceit.
Therein lies the con. If there was sufficient air time on the money wasted to build the highway and provide comparison of what we have lost on account of the wastage then the thrill of the highway may be much less, and not a lead to any Political Capital.
It is another way of how I see it!!
another political commentator put it much more articulately than anon1: "it's the economy stupid"
Post a Comment