The debate has raged recently,
especially after the results were announced on 1st October, 2013 or
World Children’s Day, that this test should be abolished or at least deferred
to a point where the kids are a lot older.
The facts are that 90% of those
who sat th4e Grade 5 exam DID NOT get their district pass mark. Hence those
children who will always remember their mark till they go to their graves, feel
that they have not made it, in being able to get to a better school which
required the higher cut off mark. (mind you the school of your choice is still
not achievable despite the higher mark due to other considerations at that
school, where they may not have sufficient places to fill the demand!)
In any case the Minister of
Education as is always the case made a hash of it by announcing publicly that
henceforth the results will always be announced on World Children’s Day so as
to demoralize 90% of those who sit the exam!!! What a total buffoon he made of
himself nationally making that announcement at Subharathai Mahamathya Vidyalaya,
in Godagama on that day. I believe just yesterday he made another inappropriate
comment. Namely at a function at Dharmapala Vidyalaya in Pannipitiya that,
though it was currently the largest school in the Country with both male and female
pupils, that he was going to make Mahinda Rajapakse Vidyalaya Homagama, the
largest co-ed school in the country. Of course it did not go down well in
Pannipitiya, but in any case biggest is not always best, though this Minister
obviously is obsessed with size.
Getting back to the main topic,
it was announced by the head of the Human Rights Commission, the not
independent Mr Mahanamahewa, that he had called the heads of 35 state and
public bodies in relevant fields to comment on the Shishyathwaya exam and to
make recommendations, which resulted in the headline in today’s Ada newspaper (www.ada.lk of 11th October 2013) namely
to have it at Grade 8.
I have long advocated that it was
a violation of the Human rights of the child to force them to study and sit for
this competitive exam at such an early stage of their lives. Whilst we
celebrate those who performed well, they are the exceptional students of our
country, who may or may not excel in life in their chosen field, and who have
an equal chance of entering University along with those who do not get the
district pass mark, which proves the uselessness of the exam.
Further the minister of education
has for the first time started a campaign that confuses students even further
by telling that the pass mark was 70 and that 90% of the students achieved this
pass mark!! So having district cut off marks and pass marks confuse students
even more, and the pressure that parents put on their offspring to perform well
at these exams takes a toll especially on the average child to which most of us
will fall into as a rule.
So where do we go from here. It
is used in practice to further deny officially for kids to get into better
schools as they did not achieve the required mark. Many schools that have 1st
Grade still continue to have a huge demand for entry, as even if the child
fails the exam they can remain in the same school, even if it is an elite
school, and so parents first try everything in their power to get them in at Grade
1 by even resorting to pay huge amounts as bribes or to Building Funds.
Of course there are some schools
that only begin at Grade 6 which if they are in the elite pool, will require
the minimum mark for that school for entry into their classes. This is in
addition to other entrance criteria that the school may have.
When one takes the Mahinda
Rajapakse Vidyalaya in Homagama, as an example, it is a brand new school which
has been allocated a huge budget that includes all kinds of facilities like
swimming pools and air-conditioned class rooms and it is in the electorate of
the present Education Minister who is determined that it be the largest and
best in the Island. Well if the equivalent funds that go to 1000 schools is
only spent on one school it is hardly a surprise, but is also exceedingly
inequitable in a state sector so to do, whilst denying basic facilities to so
many schools as a result.
All this argument amounts to a
hill of beans unless of course the quality of teaching in all schools is
improved by leaps and bounds by training our teachers to a different level, and
then paying them commensurate salaries to keep them motivated and committed to
their professions.
In my opinion this 5th
grade or any grade exam, is the wrong approach, as it just gives rise to a
tuition culture at a very early age, that benefits outside earnings for
teachers, and poorer teaching commitments by them at schools. If we abolish the
exam completely, and instead concentrate on getting a much higher standard of teacher,
both by training them to a higher level and then paying them for performance it
would completely change our education, especially at the provincial level, in turning
out educated citizens who are thinkers and not rote learners, who will enjoy their
studies as much as obtain the best in their creative minds, that will in turn truly
build a nation of productive citizens who use their innate intelligence to find rewarding employment and in turn build the
nation, as one to be envied.
3 comments:
I just saw another relevant article in the blogs see below for the link
http://www.educationforum.lk/2013/10/human-rights-commission-is-taking-up-the-grade-v-scholarship-issue/
The www.ada.lk of 11th October further stated that the Education Minister wishes Mahinda Rajapakse Vidyalaya to be largest mixed school in all of South Asia.
What is with this fixation for size! Is BIG always Better?
Interesting article on fifth grade scholarship exam. I personally prefer if it shift to grade 7 or 8, however it has both goods and bads to the society. Lots of people have discussed the good side of the decision. This shift will dis benefit those who are good in studies but unable to attend to a good school in towns. So before shifting the exam it is better to give a solution to the above mentioned problem.
Post a Comment