The debate in Parliament on
Tuesday 21st January, on the above was so that the Central Bank
would be able to impose their direction to this think tank by appointing a
director (or directors) to the Board and thereby effect its direction.
This is a grave mistake. The
Central Bank is now meddling in all sorts of areas that are NOT part of its
purview and it would be dangerous to add to that. They already have a board
with the President’s representatives and those from Academia and Chambers of
Commerce etc. however instead of the CB they seriously lack representation by
the Country’s chief opposition party, who MUST as a matter of course be
permitted to insist on a director, who can give their opinion on the direction
that IPS takes.
The Opposition UNP has people
today who are far more credible than the Govt. that is stuffed with sycophants,
and in a situation of a dictatorship where only one man’s word matters in Sri
Lanka, it is silly to add to that by another sycophant from the Central Bank.
It is bad enough that the
Treasury foots the Bill of the IPS, thereby compromising its independence, but
it has little choice in the matter, and if one has faith in the IPS CEO, in
this instance Dr. Saman Kelegama, a respected Economist at the helm to steer it
in an independent course having regard to the future direction of the Nation, then
critical areas that require further research and knowhow will be pursued.
No matter what spin the CB puts there
is big time massaging of its figures, we don’t what the IPS credibility so compromised
also. They must be a counter weight, not a dead weight!!! This is becoming more
apparent as the days go by.
The CB is getting dangerously out
of its depth, without concentrating on the areas of its initial duty. This is reflective
of a need for the Governor to assert more control over policy that amounts to attempting
to go beyond with a benign if ignorant Govt. as to what they are trying to achieve.
It is only the Treasury Secretary that tries to assert his authority when the CB
gets too arrogant, but there is no one else. MPs have no clue, and Sarath Amunugama
being the only one who can see what is happening, would rather be silent, wishing
in his twilight to finish a political career without controversy that only breeds
ill will, and he wishes to bequeath positive dividends to his family not wishing
to be too controversial.
When the Minister of Finance is the President, what do you expect, when no one is in overall charge of the Ministry. There is a Deputy, but does he have any power? So who do you think wishes to be the de facto Minister? The Governor of the CB of course. So now, he has the power to send a Bill up to Parliament, for the neanderthals in Govt who don't even know what the IPS does, to meddle in their internal affairs!
It was correct of the opposition to raise hell in parliament yesterday, but does the General Public know that? with a built in majority there is nothing they can do to change direction, so we are left to ponder on what might have been, not what is. Let us begin to ponder on WHAT WILL BE instead.
In conclusion, I also feel the EPF
MUST removed from the CB physically as well as in effective management They do not represent the interests of the stake holders who are ONLY the contributors to it, and no one else, because it is the management of their retirement we are talking about, not the ego of an individual.
2 comments:
I had not heard about this before. Given the recent news that has cast fresh doubts on the credibility of GoSL stats, could this be a move to remove yet another independent source of analysis?
Appointing another director from the CB is unnecessary since the Governor of the CB is an ex officious member of the Governing Council of IPS. In the past, Governors like AS Jayawardena participated in IPS matters actively but did not try to influence the CB will on it. However, it is reported that the incumbent Governor has deliberately kept away from IPS meetings for reasons known only to him.
Hence, what is being planned now is to make IPS an arm of CB because ,it has valiantly questioned many policy actions of CB. It commands respect from international research bodies because of its independent and impartial position on policy issues.
With this new amendment, it will be gone and it is unfortunate that SL's civil society keeps a blind eye on the murder being planned by a section opposed to iPS's independence.
Post a Comment