The
President called for a tighter regulation of International Schools, and in
addition demanded that they teach Sinhala as a language, Sri Lanka’s History
and also include Religion for their O level curriculum.
Let
me tackle the issues one at a time as they can be classed as different
viewpoints. With regard to tighter regulation, it is merely a politically
motivated statement, understating the totally chaotic state to which the Public
Education system has fallen, now resulting in the validity of exam results
being questioned.
It
is therefore very disingenuous of the President to demand regulation of this
sector, most of which have been allowed to operate as BOI registered companies,
that are run for profit.
In
my opinion, all schools must be guided by a set of principles and the Public,
Private and International sector have unique responsibilities peculiar to their
status, as the first must ensure public funds are spent in a regulated manner,
whilst the second, which also conforms to the rules of the department of
education and offer local and foreign exams to a different set of rules. The
International sector should also come under some basic rules of operation,
mainly to protect the children from breaking local laws, and the parents from
unscrupulous operators who make demands on fees and deposits unrelated to the
normal business practices of a school. IT IS NOT in the interest of the
International Schools to come under the same regulations for public schools, as
no public money is involved, except the conferring of BOI status that
nevertheless gives them tax exempt status, that bestows accountability towards
the body granting this status.
Taking
the second point, where Sinhala is deemed a necessary subject, I do not think
it is practical as there will be a list of exemptions of pupils who qualify. It
must be offered to parents who wish their children to go to International
Schools, primarily due to the poor quality of the public education system, and
would nevertheless wish their children to learn the local language.
So it MUST
be an optional available subject that MUST be offered at all schools to satisfy
a basic requirement of local students. As these schools conduct their classes
in English, one would also expect Tamil to be offered. These latter two
requirements are bound to increase the costs of these schools, and therefore
fees. There is no such thing as painless. All the suggestions include costs,
all of which will be passed on to the pupil. I am sure the President in making
the statements, did not consider this inevitability! A practical outlook should
further refine the requirements.
Whilst
saying that the Govt. must put the State Education system in order before
venturing into the realms of international schools, that is not to say that at
the same time regulation that is basic must still be applied to this sector,
which educates Sri Lankan children, and there are basic norms we require from
our youngsters.
The
issue with regards to teaching Sri Lankan history is rich when considering the
total ignorance of state school kids about history due to the nature in which
this subject is taught. If the state school history subject is re-evaluated to
one that is not politically biased, then an element of Sri Lankan History
should be included, but as the O levels are not offered in those subjects, it
is moot whether it is practical, with
none taking it up as a subject and schools offering, dropping it for
lack of demand!
When
it comes to making religion compulsory, I am personally against it, as one who
did not offer religion at O levels. In my opinion, religion MUST be restricted
even in state schools to the Sunday School education of children to follow
their own religion. Offering a very structured by rote O level, actually removes
religious teaching in schools today, to merely knowing facts to pass exams, and
not practice of faith, teaching morality, behavior and following customs, which
are the cornerstone in the practice of most religions.
Forcing
state school children to offer religion in Sri Lanka today, does not make them better
human beings in society, and further restricts the knowledge they can gain in schools,
from the core subjects a student should learn during his school days. Religion is
one that can be refined and updated even after one’s schooling and offers advantages
to some religions over others in the ease of their knowledge further destabilizing
the playing field currently destabilized depending on the language the student offers
at O levels as his principle fluency.
I gather
that a lobby group has been set up to tackle the politically biased attack by the
President, but clearly disturbing the International Schools, galvanizing them into
action. I presume that the President was goaded into making these statements as
a result of the seemingly unassailable advantage conferred on them, by default by
the parlous state of the Public Education system in which parents have completely
lost faith. If they now cannot put their children into private schools, they have
only the International Schools to turn to.
Now that prestigious state schools are
prohibitively expensive to put children into, even the cost of these international
schools in some instances are not that much higher when considering all the other
costs, of transport, tuition and sundries demanded. Let us hope this debate presumes
the best interest of the student at heart and not other agendas.
1 comment:
This is a long post that raises many issues, too many to address in my comment. The basic point that I would like to make is that while private international schools do not receive public funds, they are performing a service that is in the public interest to ensure is of a sufficient quality to meet public needs. The biggest need of the day in the present context is civic education along with technocratic education. Sri Lankan society lacks good understanding of others in the society, particularly those of different ethnicities and religions. It is essential that schools at least allow students to learn about others in the society so that they can interact as a multi-ethnic, multi-religious community when they become active citizens. What SL does not need is more citizens that are ignorant of each other and living in their own little worlds while living in Sri Lankan society. This only breeds isolationism and ultimately migration of minorities, and lack of understanding amongst the majority. Nowadays we're importing Indian labor as SL doesn't have enough to meet its development needs. Where did our labor force go??
Post a Comment