But they have not actually said so! Why?
In the month long saga since the results of
the Law College Entrance Exams were announced, accusations have been made
especially of racial bias by the Bodu Bala Sena leading to clashes and ugly
scenes in demonstrations against the result.
With the disproportionate number of Muslim
students getting high marks and also passing the exams, questions were asked,
which were vehemently denied by the Minister of Justice of his bias towards
Muslim candidates. I accepted at the time that there was no way in which the
Minister of Justice could influence the results as he is not privy to any of
the procedures in setting of or marking of these exams.
It was interesting therefore that my main
premise that as the paper was originally set in English the translation may have
been difficult and furthermore difficult for the students appears to have been
the case in the end. I surmised that if a student of the same ability in
English and Sinhala sat the Exam in each of the languages, that he would get a
higher mark in the English than in the Sinhala, as it is inherently more
difficult to answer the papers in law in Sinhala!
This has proved to be correct and the
allegation from the Bodu Bala Sena has now become, and I quote from an article
“BBS said that an error has occurred during the
Sinhala translation of the law entrance examination causing injustice to the
Sinhala medium students.” They
have therefore asked for the students who wrote the paper in Sinhala to be
given 14 extra marks due to the 7 questions being mistranslated! Otherwise they
would agitate.
Of
course in this statement they did not admit to false allegations, but it is
clear in their latest press statement what they are now trying to do. The
government as always open to compromise, did the next best thing without
hurting the feelings of the students who passed the first time, by effectively
reducing the pass mark from 69 to 66 whereby more students passed with the
intake up from 309 to 551, giving a record increase in students admitted to Law
College!
What
does this mean? If there was no malpractice in the exams marking, then anyone
who feels aggrieved can agitate and force the Govt. to a position that gives
them rights, which even if existing students are not denied, as in the Z score
case, is going to make it more difficult for ALL students admitted due to the
space issue and added class and teaching facilities that are needed. I trust
that the exams will be just as tough, and the pass mark not lessened. It would
be interesting to note that when they sit their final exams how many in each of
the two groups do in fact pass, before we are able to pass some comment on the
outcome of this exercise to them.
No comments:
Post a Comment