I was privileged to be invited to the
Seminar “Gamani Corea’s contribution to Domestic and International Economic
Policy” sponsored by the Gamani Corea Foundation, held at the Institute of
Policy Studies Auditorium, at Independence Square that started at 2pm and when
I left having being walked to my car by Dr.Saman Kelegama, the current
Executive Director/ CEO it was 9pm.
For one to truly understand the
contribution Gamani Corea had to both Domestic Economic and Development Policy
planning and execution and International Appreciation of some of the particular
concerns of the poor nations one would either have had to attend this seminar,
or be a student of this eminent son of Sri Lanka.
I will not go into detail or summarize
each of the speakers’ major points as it pertains to the above, as it will be
shortly documented and possibly printed for future study and appreciation by
students interested in some of the history of Economic and Development policy
to better understand why we are at this state of development today.
I will instead provide some personal
insights into the event and observations I made there from.
The illustrious line up of participants
in the seminar had some indirect or direct contact with Gamani Corea, and
accordingly illustrated by way of anecdote, or explained by way of historical
context as to characters of the day, his contribution and thinking that had an
impact on world and Sri Lankan affairs.
A little known tale of how he was less
than two years old when Mahatma Gandhi came to stay at his Grandparents home
“Sigiriya” in Chilaw, on his only visit to the island, in 1927 and made an
impression on the great man, must have rubbed off on him as Manmohan Singh the
present Indian Prime Minister and great friend of Gamani Corea, has also
extolled his greatness.
NONE of the speakers, possibly reflecting
their elder status, put in context his age at which some of these thought
provoking and cutting edge economic theories and ideas were put forward and
implemented. It is important for today’s student to put that in context, as
well as the knowledge and technology since that have made forecasting,
planning, and sensitivity analysis that much easier to perform.
Being born on November 4th
1925, he was at Corpus Christi College, Cambridge in 1945, when England was in
shambles, starving, rationing, and he had money! More than most of the English
even at Cambridge. It was US money that bailed out England in those days!
When in 1952, he worked as an Economist
for Dudley Senanayake, his relative, He was only 27, and already had two BAs,
two MAs from both Cambridge and Oxford, and DPhil (PhD) from Oxford!
Though not mentioned at the seminar, Dudley
was in and out of his mother’s house, Horton Lodge as he was quite infatuated (also
madly in love with) with Gamani’s mother Freda, (Sir John Kotelawala’s sister)
and some say, that was why Dudley never married.
He drafted the 6 year plan for Sir John,
when he was PM in 1956 at the mere age of 30 and the 10 year plan for SWRD
Bandaranayake in 1959 at 33 before his34th Birthday.
No wonder that he had served his country
well when he was made the EU Ambassador in 1973 by Mrs B at 48 and UNCTAD Sec
Gen before he reached 50.
The long list of participants in
discussions and moderation included contemporaries who worked closely with him,
such as Godfrey Goonetilleke, Lloyd Fernando, Usvatte Arachchi, Dr Nimal
Sanderatne, Mr Lakdasa Hulugalle, Jayantha Dhanapala, and those who interacted
with him later, such as Hilarian Codipilly, Indrajit Coomaraswamy, WA
Wijewardena, Harsha Aturupana, WD Lakshman, Saman Kelegama, A de VDS
Indraratne. I was also pleased to see some familiar faces such as Chandi
Chanmugam, Bradman Weerakoon, VK Wickremasinghe as well as many other of
Gamani’s contemporaries from the Central Bank and other Ministries that he
worked at.
Apart from Tissa Vitharana, a senior
Minister of Science and Technology, and one who was part of the left wing
thinkers in Gamani’s planning ministry era,
who gave the keynote speech as the Chief Guest alluding to his greatness
in the context of Sri Lanka, there was NO
ONE from Government, reflecting the complete absence of intellectual
thought emanating from there, and was please to see my good friend Eran
Wickremaratne who will be able to put in context Gamani’s contribution, when
understanding some of the political and policymaking challenges he has to
grapple with in presenting the Opposition’s Policy to take the Country to the
next level.
Conspicuous by their absence was the
CENTRAL BANK contingent, WHO WERE INVITED (I was particularly adamant upon my
receiving the invitation, to request that the whole Research Team at the
Central Bank was invited considering Gamani’s contribution there, just in case
they had overlooked that!
Considering Gamani was the Director of
Economic Research in 1965 and Deputy Governor in 1970, it was shameful that the
CB think tank were not able to learn from all the greats of yesteryear so that
they could perform their tasks better.
I will go as far as publicly accuse the
Central Bank hierarchy of intellectual vandalism, in not permitting the best
and brightest of our public servants from gathering notable facts of history
and how it can be better put in context with the problems they must grapple
with today. The blame ultimately MUST rest with Nivaard Cabral, who appears to
have politicized a largely apolitical position, so that by muzzling the freedom
to associate in intellectual thought, is carrying forward the Government policy
of misleading firstly their own policy makers, into making bad choices and
decisions that bear NO MERIT in reality.
Just to summarize the event briefly,
Gamani’s detailed analysis given by Godfrey Goonetilleke a very close associate
and I believe the Chairman of his Foundation, should have left the lengthy
document to be read by the attendees and reduced his time to just a few
personal observation. The session then would have been more fruitful permitting
a greater participation of the audience which was NOT possible due to time
constraints.
Gamani’s life was in three parts, his
contribution to Sri Lanka’s policy making then his UNCTAD years, and the later
years in the NIEO and North South Dialog as well as the South Forum, whilst at
the same time setting up the Sri Lanka Economic Association, Marga Institute and
the Institute of Policy Studies, that are NOW in a position to carry on the intellectual
discussion, with a view to influencing the Governments of the day on major aspects
of policy so that Sri Lanka can meet its future challenges.
One notable and contemporary issue that Gamani
appears to have sown the seeds was the climate change, environment debate, where
we in Sri Lanka owe to Gamani Corea to put forward development policies that will
realize sustainable development without environmental degradation, and in fact incorporate
environmental regeneration to reverse the drastic environmental damage caused since
2004 that at today’s pace will leave a legacy of waste and desolation for our future,
IF WE DO NOT ACT IMMEDIATELY TO ARREST IT.
There were NO young faces, except for the
staff of IPS who also attended. It is a sign of our times, when today’s youth in
their quest for learning, miss the basics! I hope the Gamani Corea Foundation understand
that their primary job is to improve Economic understanding of the future policy
makers, and make a conscious effort to identify, promote, educate and incentivize
the best of our young fertile minds into this sphere of policy and decision making,
and intellectualize by way of similar seminars so that new ideas can be developed
in arriving at truly Sri Lankan solutions to the myriad of self inflicted wounds
that afflict our Country.
We can NO LONGER blame, as was the case in
Gamani’s time, the Western Developed Nations for the core of our internal problems.
I respectfully commend the leadership of
Dr Saman Kelegama and his staff at IPS for making the effort to make the seminar
a resounding success and I sincerely hope that the event is well documented for
a future student to learn from.
I also hope that the huge endowment that
Gamani Corea, bequeathed to “the future Sri Lankan” is put to the use it was intended
for, and not frittered away by those who already have served their nation believing
it to be a fora a for a few fun days to live through their retirement reminiscing
on their glory days!
4 comments:
if there were no youth or government people there, the seminar was a failure. only the glitterati of yesteryear reminiscing on the past, with no connection to the present or the future.
the printed version of the proceedings will be a useful document for the future.
yes young economics students were absent, but it underscored the need for taking the level of economics teaching from mere text books now to discussions using the resources arising out of the seminar in as much as it referred to how yesteryear's issues have dovetailed into present day problems we are grappling with, which if our planners were aware of what transpired, would not make the same mistakes they appear to make as was made then.
it is more the fault of the education system where even a professor of public policy at the Post Graduate Institute of Management was a speaker, but there were none of his students, present who could of learned a lot about Public Policy dos and donts.
Fortunately all is not lost as the whole proceedings were recorded for future use, and it should be used as a teaching tool in relevant study programs.
Actually ALL seminars are a waste of time, as they are all more relevant NOT to the audience present, but to one who either cannot pay the entrance fee or are unaware of it that it really would benefit.
Just look at the participants of these hugely expensive events, that charge a lot of money, paid for by companies on the mistaken belief that they will benefit their employees, when in fact thy just go to spend sometime out of the office and network more for personal gain!!!
Using that criteria this freebie was probably a success for those who attended it and for those who were invited to attend, and the lack of policy makers is the fault of the policy makers or youth and NOT of the seminar proper.
A brain dead Government cannot be forced to attend intellectual discussions, their absence certainly does not make an event such as this a failure.
When a set of people are prevented from attending due to a puerile decision of a minor official, you cannot blame the event as a failure.
Post a Comment