My previous blog entries discussed the
rights and privileges of education at Tertiary level especially as it relates
to the Free Education concept.
If one enters a free education program,
then should one accept what is on offer, or agitate for more, as is the current
case with the Allied Health Sciences students? Those of us who look at it from
the outside, believe that if a student partakes in a course that is free, they
are by right denying another person that privilege, but they get in only due to
their being “better’ as in Z score or fortunate as in District quota, where a
better qualified student is denied entry from say Colombo.
So in this era of NO free education for
all, but a few scholarships for some (22,000 who enter the State University
system) , if you are not happy with the 3 year scholarship of a degree, then
leave, and give it to a student who will gladly accept it. Your Z score only
entitles you for that. If you say that external forces, have led to the forced reduction
in your syllabus to three years and that you demand four years, what rights do you
really have to say so, except point to an anomaly?
You cannot compare with a private sector
education as market forces completely determine who enters, along with minimum qualifications.
So you cannot demand, only make a rational case for your degree being worthless,
or would leave you in an unemployable state within the State Health Sector. If the
State offers a job at a reasonable remuneration, then you have less cause to complain,
and if you wish to improve your skills by getting a higher degree, then you may
have to pay for it.
It is these points that ought to be considered
in your campaign as IUSF is also outdated, when they agitate for free education
for all who pass A levels, an impossible demand for any country, especially Sri
Lanka to even contemplate.
It is time you understand your privileged
position within the hierarchy of undergraduates, and determine what the best course
of action is given the alternatives. I do agree though that the GMOA is out of line
in making demands, now they are interfering in the levels of qualifications that
specialists posses in the Private Health Sector. They have NO say in this matter
and it is for the UGC to work with the Health department to determine how best the
shortage of Health Service workers are filled and at what income and qualification
level.
The bottom line is, the reality that an Undergraduate
in the State University system must really agitate for a good education in their
chosen field and nothing else.
1 comment:
take this example from the animal kingdom and see how it applies. if you give a monkey an apple, he will be happy. if you give a monkey 2 apples, he will be even happier. if you take 1 of the 2 apples away from the monkey he will be upset, even though he should be happy with his 1 apple. are we not just well-dressed monkeys???
Post a Comment