It is important to place some faith in
the latest report with evidence that, "in measuring human satisfaction, which
should be surely what we all should be aspiring to in this world, until we eventually
give up the ghost and die, that to ask ourselves what is it that gives us a satisfying life?" This is supposedly better
achieved from places rather than things.
Does that explain the fixation of our
citizenry in going to places like Kataragama as a place of pilgrimage to pay
homage, so that in that place they get a level of contentment from the
surroundings, or doing the obligatory religious observances there. I don’t know
the answer, but it sure seems that they get more fulfillment from that than
from other material items in their possession. Of course I then presume that different people have a particular place that gives them this desire or contentment.
It is important to understand human
feelings, needs, aspirations, and mood that one is in and how does one get a
better sense of worth, of contentment and of fulfillment?
This report seems to place importance on
places, that possibly give you happiness and therefore it is rational that we
all gravitate to places where this is optimal to us within the constraints of
our lives. If we are not wealthy enough to go overseas, we may get more
satisfaction from visiting a place in our own country and relaxing there if we
find that place relaxing, soothing or whatever feeling we are after. In short the feel good factor
This finding proves a point and further
reinforces even the Buddhist philosophy that material possessions don’t necessarily
give us what we are looking for, instead the location we find ourselves in may
be just as if not more important than the things we possess.
I am still unsure that when they say
places, if we are truly happy in a place, a location or even the home we are
living in, then one could argue that nothing else will give you as much
pleasure, so we don’t have to pursue this dream of pleasure when in reality we already have it where we are.
Just think about it. It means that once
we find a place we are truly contented in, then we are able to forego some
other material items which pale in need, and want, in favor of the location we
find ourselves in. It sure is a philosophical question and answer session, that
should focus us to achieve our personal desires that may not require a huge
investment of money.
Merely the art of managing on what we currently have to
suit the moment, especially if we have no guarantee that our locational experience that gives our happiness, is in fact not permanent and only fleeting! This is
further evidence of the importance of choice to make us feel good.
1 comment:
i can buy it. happiness is more experience based than to do with an object, that is not the object of your affection.
The object of your affection can make you happy or sad depending on how he or she behaves and reciprocates your feelings. Treading very deep emotions here.
Post a Comment