The
Sri Lanka Tourism Brand – Longer Term Enhancement
Aspects covered here. The informal
tourism sector of lodging that provide at least 60% of room nights of foreign
citizen tourists visiting Sri Lanka.
This will NOT cover Sri Lankan origin
foreign nationals who are more likely to have researched their stays, and
either stay with friends and family for part of their vacation and for the
other part engage mainly formal tourist establishments, and Boutique Hotels,
which may not be registered with Sri Lanka Tourism. Often they travel with
locals and friends, and demand resident rates to maximize their tourism spend.
This is a growing area with more and more expatriate arrivals and a significant
contributor to the economy, but which grows organically with or without a
marketing campaign by the various Government Bodies like SLTDA.
The
Independent Traveler Planning a stay from a few nights to a few weeks
Here, we home in on the Independent
Traveler, who we wish to attract as a first time visitor to the Island, who
wishes to organize his or her itinerary, mostly by themselves, using the
Internet and various booking sites.
Initially they need a good website to
decide how and where to go, and there is NO comprehensive website that is of
any use to this visitor, who is left to either buy a Travel Guide and follow
some of the suggestions there, or just decide on a location and begin by
booking accommodation.
Websites such as Booking.com and Air
B&B are popular sites used by these travelers, some of whom just book one
or two nights initially, and prefer to book future stays once they arrive and
survey the scene, but still use the same medium to book the further stays. In
my experience of Paradise Farm bookings, often bookings are made the day before
arrival by a tourist already in the Island, when there is space availability.
Advance pre bookings lately are only around 25% of room nights.
It is likely that the well healed
Tourist will book locations in advance in high end resorts, and that does not
matter if they are formal or informal as they would not even know if it is
registered with the SLTDA, as that would be irrelevant to them, if the location
is one that either has been recommended or has a high rating on sites such as
Trip Advisor, where prior guest rankings and experiences are used in making the
decision to reserve a room.
Let’s divide the strategy into a two
pronged one to register, high and low end.
Registration
of Unregistered Lodgings with the SLTDA
I presume the use of the world Informal
Sector is because those lodging establishments are not registered. They fall
into the whole spectrum of lodging at every pricing level.
In order to offer to good Tourism
Product for visitors to Sri Lanka, it is important that all providers of
lodging for tourists to Sri Lanka, who have little or no prior knowledge of the
Country, are regulated, so as to ensure that minimum standards are adhered to,
and not only that, in order to assist Tourists in making up their mind on
reservation, have some kind of criteria with which to judge the lodging, that
they could trust. There is no question that presently the Trip Advisor rankings
are used as the best source of independent verification.
The
Question one must ask first is whether we need to register them in the first
place and why?
Of course the first answer is that we
(SLTDA) needs to know how many beds are available in the Island for tourists,
at each level, in order to determine what mix and how to spend the marketing
dollars here in order to attract the mix to fill these rooms across the spectrum.
So we agree that the regulating body
that promotes Tourism must know how many rooms are available, so they can work
on the supply side to fill gaps in numbers, locations and quality of rooms.
Currently they have NO CLUE!
Reason
for non-Registration is Regulation and Fees
A struggling tourism sector does not
want to pay a turnover based fee to the SLTDA, as many are barely making ends
meet. Those who are paying fees by being registered are resentful that the
informal sector gets away with loopholes.
How can this dilemma be solved. Simply
put the playing field HAS TO BE level for all, and all turnover based fees MUST
BE IMMEDIATELY REMOVED.
The fee must be simply an annual fee
based on Star Class or Type of Establishment and number of beds offered, a
double bed treated as 2 (5ft wide or more) This is in order to obtain
registration only, and category of hotel or stars over 2 stars for which a
certificate is required, another flat fee for the granting of a certificate to
take account of the need of that establishment to get an official grading and
the administration work required to annually inspect and award. All other
establishments are registered and not rated, as they may possess individual
characteristics that they may have that attract the visitor.
Annual
bed charge for registration could be a system as follows
Homestay Accommodation @ Rs1000 per bed
per annum, divided by two to be paid in two equal instalments 1st
January and 1st July. It may sound too low, but this is the very
establishment that is in need of the MOST REGULATION, and constant evaluation
and un-announced site visits, as well as the training required for the owners,
usually the Head of Household.
Small Hotels Rs4,000 per head up to 2
stars also payable in two instalments
3 Star @ 5,000, 4 Star @ 6,000 and 5
Star and above including Boutique Hotels charging in excess of US$100+ per
night at Rs8,000.
My understanding is that there are
presently 100,000 head in these establishments on the island. Simply put
100,000 people can be put up a night at a maximum in Sri Lanka and if they are
all regulated, the income from this charge would be Rs250M p/annum. This should
be sufficient just to regulate and staffing to inspect and advise on the actual
maintenance of the standards, certification, training and assistance where
needed. The informal sector will receive a disproportionate level of service as
they are more in need to be regulated, due to their 100% lack of regulation at
present.
The informal sector MUST feel that their
being regulated is not one that will result in them being taxed in future, but
is one they will definitely be able to use as a marketing tool in attracting
visitors and one which the minimal cost of registration will be more than
outweighed by the benefits of a regulation certificate they can display
prominently in the establishment.
Why
am I concentrating on this unregulated sector registration as being of utmost
importance?
Today’s and the future’s tourist product
is all experiential. That is, the visitor is looking for a unique experience in
their holiday, something that they can remember the holiday by and perhaps have
fond memories and photographs to share with friends back home, which we obviously
hope will lead to their friends being attracted to do the same.
The object of a good Tourism Brand is
for visitors who have experienced it to recommend to their friends and family
and for them to be repeat visitors. This then reduces the need for exponential
increases in advertising and promotion, and the future growth can be
concentrated on improving product, so a higher per diem charge can be obtained.
Many in the business want to jump the hurdle and say we should only concentrate
on the high end.
While at first sight I may agree to
that, in the Sri Lankan context we have some structural changes that are needed
before we get there, as we first need to educate the various service providers
on what it is that the tourist is looking for, in order to be able to increase
the yield per day per visitor. We have not got there yet, and in fact we are
doing our utmost to denigrate the experience with some of the actions of the
players and stakeholders, and we must try and plug those most shameless
exploitative practices that are common.
The
Key to Homestay Tourism Concentration (an example)
In my opinion, the dollars spent by the
tourist reaches the rural masses faster than any other sector in the Tourism
Industry. In my experience and travels around the Island, I have seen some
extremely beautiful sights, where for example if only a rural subsistence
farmer had the wherewithal or the foresight to invest in a detached room,
bathroom and a decent sized verandah all in one building, they could house a
tourist couple for a longer stay in villages, the rural village experience in
Sri Lanka is attractive to youth visitors under 30 who are more able to rough
out in three wheelers and buses, but who need a quiet SAFE SECURE PLACE TO
STAY.
Farmers who live hand to mouth could
depending on the quality of accommodation they can provide, be able to get out
of poverty and dependence on farming income if this sector is expanded and
encouraged. The foreign investment component of construction and food is
minimal and so most of the dollars spent, not only stays in the rural areas,
but are also locally sourced, with minimal import. The Savvy traveler books one
night on Booking.com homestay and then stays a week or two if the place is
agreeable if they come not for a lightening trip to see sights but to
experience a part of Sri Lanka outside of the Guide Books. This is the tourist
who refuses to pay the charges to climb Sigiriya, many of whom I have met in my
travels, but wish to experience how the people of Sri Lanka really live.
What
is the role of the regulator here?
The regulators job is to encourage, show
that one room is better than two as many try to achieve more than is practical
and to provide blue prints on what the minimum standards of cleanliness,
safety, food safety and precautions needed to keep the visitors safe. This is
an area that visitors to areas not frequented by tourists are conscious of and
local Police are unprepared to face consequences of crime against Tourists, a
major deterrent to the success of this the most productive sector Tourism, as
far as the economy is concerned. There is much scope for value addition and for
children to learn about what is special about their own environment to be able
to appreciate and show the visitor the unique features.
Conclusion
Don’t forget that today, with 60% + room
nights in the informal and therefore unregulated sector, Tourists are on their
own, with no protection. This is a disaster waiting to happen, if this sector
is not regulated as soon as possible.
Due to the blinkered view of the
Industry looking at the unregulated sector, as more of a pain in the rear end,
they have not realized that it could be the last straw that breaks the camel’s
back if a tourist gets raped in a house and this information goes viral. They
don’t care if the excuse is it is unregulated or not, it is the Sri Lanka
Tourism Brand that is at stake here.
The reason that happens is that the
providers of this service, are unaware of the dangers lurking below the surface
of our people who are not used to seeing half clothed tourists walking around.
Some of the tourists too are unaware of the risks they take.
Regulations such the preference for a
detached room to house a visitor instead of a room in the house for example,
will mean that minimum precautions are made clear. Lockable rooms, and
bathrooms being another. Food safety being another.
We in Sri Lanka cannot “wing it” as it
were. That time has passed. We have to be aware of how the visitor is treated.
Questionnaires could be provided at all establishments with post-paid
envelopes, so letters come direct to the SLTDA as that will immediately alert
the inert in these establishments to the real issues faced by tourists. Currently
no sampling of this nature takes place. Replies can be anonymous or with
detailed information, so those who wish to leave their contact details in their
home countries can be immediately contacted and any negative connotations
immediately neutralized.
This is the most invaluable tool in
constantly updating the checklist of regulations and best practice to be
abreast of the dangers in real time and make appropriate changes where
necessary.
No matter what the Industry veterans in
the Regulated and Registered sector think, it is the informal sector that has
the greatest potential for increasing the accommodation in the short term and
increase the multiplier effect of Tourism in the Economy of Sri Lanka, where
this sector is the only one that can increase the foreign exchange contribution
to the economy. I therefore cannot stress enough the urgency and the importance
of the proposals I have made to improve the Tourism Product in Sri Lanka in
order to attract the numbers of tourists to the Island. It is the improvement
of the service standards that will then gradually flow into the high end once
the Brand is established and high spenders come in droves.
4 comments:
Considering the potential of Tourism for the Sri Lanka economy - I believe it can comfortably contribute 25% without being over visited, there is NO proper state planning on policy, mechanism, regulation, management of our national treasures that attract tourists, and as you say they don't even know the number of beds available for occupation.
How on earth can billions of rupees be wasted in Marketing when non of the above is properly managed or husbanded.
It is a question of putting the cart before the horse. Just see that with no input from the State, the industry has been able to get itself listed as the place to visit. If that is a fluke, then just see the potential that has not even been tapped, leaving each person to do as he or she pleases.
We must move out of Eda Vela Tourism to one that gives tourists value for money at each price point, and benefit the community in a sustainable way which is undoubtedly one of the SDGs
You have identified a good business model which can use a Quango to administer this aspect of Tourist Establishments. It is too much bureaucracy to task this to the SLTDA who don't understand Tourism in the first place.
This should be left to a newly created organization that is independent of the Private Sector and the Government in order to gain credibility, established by charter who can bill and collect fees on the line you suggested and administer the granting of certificates and star rankings.
The most important area that I don't know how to regulate is that this organization cannot be corrupt, taking money for granting gradings, something that happens worldwide, but could be worse in Sri Lanka and then the whole exercise itself falls into disrepute, if the regulator is corrupt!
There is a genuine fear of being registered in Sri Lanka, unlike in other countries where people will queue up to be registered.
So the benefits accruing to the registered must be quite clear and that they will not be chased for taxes, especially in a field that should get subsidies anyway if it is identified as a core industry for development.
You could grant a fee free first year to encourage registration and then pull up unregistered businesses in the form of fine or notice pasted outside, that it is NOT registered, in order to get everyone on board. This will only be a one time exercise and it will then create a culture where anyone wishing to offer a room even for a guest, will want to be registered.
I also meant to say that if all registered establishments are on a comprehensive website that can be searched in many ways as part of the Sri Lanka Tourism Website, then there is incentive enough to be registered if all establishments are told the potential audience is unquantifiable. Further the inclusion of the facilities website or weblink will enable further investigation by the potential guest and quality control by the regulator at the same time, if some information displayed seems to display negative offering.
Post a Comment