After a crippling accident in 2011, (as
a result of a high speed convoy of a Cabinet Minister of Justice in the MR
Government skidding into me) I had to give up my full time job as a farmer, and
I effectively lost everything I had built up to that point, and had to start
again in a series of new ventures, one of which is to update this blog in
matters of the day that may lead if recommendations are taken up, to improve
the quality of life of the people who live in Sri Lanka.
Knowing the difficulty I faced in growing
with first-hand experience, I allowed a neighborhood farmer and his wife, Maddu
and Wife Pictured here, to work my land in Raja Ela, Hingurakgoda, while I
still work my farm in Godagama, Meegoda, under enormous odds battling the poor
human resource I have to contend with.
As a one stop shop, when I was farming,
where I personally planted my crops, maintained them and when I had my harvest,
I transported personally, and sold direct to the ultimate consumer, driving the
pick-up truck around Colombo into my consumers’ homes. This was the only way to
ensure some form of financial security. Not surprisingly this back braking work
of a unique nature, is not one I have encountered ANYONE following in my
footsteps or of anyone who preceded me in this comprehensive activity.
If the reader wants to see the evidence
of that era (2004-2011) please check my blogs www.rajaratarala.blogspot.com &
www.villagerinsrilanka.blogspot.com
for my thoughts, ideas, and frustrations in that task.
NOTHING HAS CHANGED either then (70years
ago), or now in 2018, when one would at least hope that our farmers are in a better
position than they were in the past! Simply put Governments of the past 70
years have failed the farming community very badly.
THE
POLICY PROPOSAL
THE
GRIM REALITY – HELP ONLY THE LONG TERM FARMER WITH UNDER 5 ACRES UNDER
CULTIVATION
The number of people with total
livelihood from farming is a fraction of people who receive the fertilizer
subsidy, or who receive the Rs5,000 an acre payment. The only way to asses this
is to look at each household income, to ascertain need. The Grama Niladari can
do this, butthey are not even properly equipped to keep this information on a
lap top let alone a TAB. In order to expedite this exercise only this official
can practically provide the data without delay.
From a mere look at my neighborhood in
Ratmale a farming village, and Raja Ela, Hingurakgoda, a Colony settled
village, I will place an educated guess that about 20% of households have 75%
or more of their household income from Agriculture. It is these Households
which are in need and who MUST be helped immediately. By how much or by what
means is up to the powers, but I suggest a subsidy of Rs10K a month per
household for one year. (it may have 2 to 8 people per household) These people
(sometimes both husband and wife work on the land) have been in farming for at
least 20 years full time, if not more, and cannot do anything else at this
stage, and so MUST be recognized and appreciated.
The average village or rural household,
has a teacher, or postman, or policeman, shop worker, three wheeler driver,
forces personnel, government servant, pharmaceutical rep, agricultural
pesticide rep, teacher, kasippu distiller, poacher, shop worker etc. no wonder
there are NO takers for farming positions anyway!
Please remember that 5 times more people
are helped NOW that NEED the help and so the cost is so much higher, but it is
POLITICS and NOT NEED that determine today’s spreading of the largesse of
fertilizer subsidy or cash payment. The need for votes outweighs the need to do
real justice to the needy.
The GN should NOT be told why this
information is needed, otherwise, they being political animals, are not
concerned about livelihood of the people they are responsible for, and will
skew the data, so that only their friends are helped, and others with real need
are ignored. Of course the information supplied can be audited to ascertain its
reliability, with a degree of statistical accuracy.
Center for Poverty Analysis writes
reports ad nauseam about who is poor and malnourished and what is needed, but
no blanket short term fix is even suggested as they are unable to specifically identify
who the real poor are!
We can go a long way in helping this
segment of the population, who I estimate to be at most 8% of Households in Sri
Lanka. (By the way I am merely concentrating on farmer families who are the
working destitute only and many may be in debt too!)
We can assist the truly needy under this
plan, enabling debt repayment, financial counseling of people receiving, while
noting this is temporary relief to get them back on their feet and work with
them to enable them to make better decisions in order to get them out of their present
predicament. IT IS NOT LIKE SAMURDI which has become a PERMANENT ENTITLEMENT,
where only 25% of recipients would be categorized as the truly needy.
OTHER
MATTERS THAT NEED TO PUT IN PLACE – LONG TERM
I will not go into some of the
structural changes necessary today, in order to make agriculture more
efficient, effectively in ownership and tenant farming to remove marginal farmers
from being enslaved, (forced to live on the land for fear of losing it) to take
account of modern technology. I have previously blogged about that, and will
refine the proposed policy changes I recommend to take account of the labor
shortages in the rural areas, as it pertains to youth unwilling to pursue
farming as a career, climate change as the new normal that requires a further degree
of refinement and insurance.
The proposal concetrates on the
immediate relief necessary NOT TO dissuade existing agricultural workers, from
giving up, adding to the Food Security Issue.
A recent plaster patch was offered by
the state in promising Rs500/50kg fertilizer bag to farmers of Paddy and
Rs1500/50kg of other crops, subject to a maximum and with a whole series of form
filling and authorization from local worthies in order to receive this subsidy.
This was to replace the Rs5,000 per acre
subsidy per Season (two seasons) paid direct to the Bank accounts of these
farmers, which was replaced. That was due to the recent shortage of fertilizer caused
by the failure of the Public Servants / Politicians to have the required quantity
of fertilizer in the stores at the time of need. The Farmer associations therefore
AGITATED for its removal and replacement with the subsidized fertilizer.
This was pointed out as being ONE of the
reasons for the current government losing support of the voters at the recent
elections, but that fact has NOT been substantiated, and if the debate at a
recent Cabinet Meeting is anything to go by where there was a bitter division
between one faction favoring a cash payment and another favoring a subsidy,
illustrates how BANKRUPT the cabinet ministers are as they are merely arguing
about whether to put sultanas or raisins in a man’s cake before giving it, when
the man is simply eating plain rice, down from three times a day to twice!
They have simply failed to acknowledge the
complete breakdown of the food chain where the producer (the farmer) receives a
fair shake in the food chain, dominated by traders. This lack of understanding
of the basics by those in power, while paying lip service pretending they fully
understand the pain farmers undergo, is the pinnacle of this subterfuge that
has taken place throughout our history and there is still NO fundamental change
to that. It goes without saying that as part of the long term solution is the
whole aspect of the power of traders, and minimizing the post-harvest losses.
An additional Jonah in the pack are the
Farmers Association Leaders who for want of their personal brand, do not truly
represent the farmers’ needs, and only pretend they are truly representative as
they are merely pawns of political parties who have a political agenda, and not
an immediate agenda to give relief to the farmers in distress. So the
Government yet again is simply providing succor to this supposed need, instead
of digging deep to the core of the problem.
In short we are dealing with a topic
where both the State Participants, as in the Government and the Public Servants
in this field, have no direct understanding of the problem. To add to this the
Department of Census & Statistics has been unable to properly asses the
households in dire need, who are farmers effectively with 75% + of their income from Agriculture. So without
data, no one has been able to opine on this sensitive and critical issue that
faces the nation. Food Shortages, mass de camping from Agriculture is imminent,
unless a suggestion such as mine is immediately implemented.
This has nothing to do with capitalism,
socialism or any other ism. Developed Countries subsidize their farmers far
more than we do. WE don’t have unlimited resources to subsidize farmers, who
amount to a far higher proportion of people than in developed countries, but we
must address the extreme ends of this issue.
CONCLUSION
This proposal can immediately give
relief without busting the Treasury, and could actually reduce the present cost,
as those in this payment will not receive Samurdhi, and those outside will not
receive a subsidy, as they simply don’t need it to survive, and should carry
out practices to become more efficient, by either consolidating holdings or using
more efficient means of agriculture, which the segment I have selected to
assist will find hard to do out of practice and lack of thinking skills, and
mired in the vicious cycle of poverty, who have to sell their produce to anyone
who offers, knowing their plight and take advantage of their dilemma and penury
to enrich their greed. (aka Money Lenders)
Don’t forget it is this very segment of
population that has been forced to take out high interest debt to local money
lenders, as they have NO other means to raise funds, adding to their plight. They
are the forgotten RANAVIRUS of our society who through thick and thin war and
peace have grown the food that has fed the nation and the NATION OWES A DEBT as
much as it owes to the soldiers who fought the war, if not more, but who have
been singularly ignored.
I know so many in this category and my
admiration for their fortitude knows no limits, I just wish I could do more for
these people than I do.
4 comments:
If you take Maddu and his wife in the picture, who are farming my land for a peppercorn, as I don't have the heart to ask them for anything in return, and this time I met him he asked for a loan to help him out!
Well in his case he is from a long line of farmers, but they are empty nesters now, whose children have flown the coop and have NO intention ever of doing farming seeing their parents daily fight with a combination of elements all the time.
The day I visited, he had a problem with the peacocks with the paddy, the monkeys with the tamarind that was becoming mature, the parrots with the makaral, the diseases of the green chillie that could not be controlled, the giant squirrals with the Manogs on the trees to name just a few!
Sunday Times reports that the Cabinet decided to give subsidized fertilizer instead of cash, because the Farmers spent the money on Alcohol.
If that is the rationale for the Cabinet making this decision, then I it is an indictment of the complete failure as a nation to arrest the widespread alcohol abuse in the rural areas, that is affecting the quality of life there. So if they do that with Fertilizer money they will do the same with any money they receive for their produce anyway. After all money is money and managing money is the issue here.
We cannot make these blasé statements and not provide them with the money for them to spend in any way they wish. After all the fertilizer that the State provides is also of questionable quality, and farmers will prefer to have the cash to buy better quality from reputed companies like Bauer. However I don’t expect anyone in the Cabinet to have even heard of them, let alone believe that nothing other than a Nanny State is all we can insist on.
Something is very wrong with this logic of decision making in Sri Lanka.
Short Term Solution to alleviate abject Poverty
It seems to me that this is a short term solution to help the hard working poor, and not the lazy poor, which Samurdhi helps with. It is true that people over a certain age, who only know one field of earning, cannot be directed to other means of supplementing their income. The problem here is identifying this specific population that needs help, not the general population at large who could be covered with this scheme.
In an entitlement culture, all those who DO NOT receive entitlements become an additional problem when it comes to helping the truly deserving. Can’t a market based approach, of giving them a guaranteed price, do the same thing? I guess the problem becomes they are given the produce by other farmers to sell as theirs, completely nullifying the whole purpose. Sri Lankans are past masters at playing the system to their advantage. Whatever measure is adopted, people find ways to get benefits, to which they are not entitled.
So administering a just system is the real issue here, and may not be practical.
You are losing the whole point here. The long term objective is to improve agricultural productivity. The short term is to assist the working poor, to remain in Agriculture, until the former is secured. Will both objectives be achieved?
Post a Comment